Grand Vision

20141229_032610 20141229_032644Pictured above is a document I found laying on the ground near a metrolink station.


I picked the pseudonym “Winston Smith” as an obvious reference to the character with the same name from George Orwell’s famous novel 1984.  In the novel, Mr. Smith is a member of the governmental agency known as the Ministry of Truth. Despite the positive sounding name, the agency is in actuality more aptly called the ministry of propaganda. The character longs for the ability tell the truth. In reference to Ferguson, I knew that my accounts of an officer on the ground would largely be dismissed as propaganda and so with a dose of tongue-in-cheek irony, I decided to name my internet persona after a character known for spreading lies at the behest of the government.


As we near the end of the year, I’ve had some time to reflect on the events of Ferguson and all the communities it has touched in some way. Berkeley has proven that from here on out any officer involved shooting in North St. Louis County will result in localized rioting. Ironically, in the Post-Ferguson climate of the region (and abroad), officer involved shootings are more likely to occur due to a police agencies that are stretched thin, overworked, and stressed to the breaking point while facing a criminal element empowered by vitriolic, punitive, anti-police sentiment and by protesters who continue to court and indoctrinate mentally ill or violent individuals. Just a few hours ago, there were reports (that I can’t confirm) that a Ferguson officer took gunfire on W. Florissant about halfway between Canfield and Ferguson Ave.

masrisuicideSpann8josh952How many times do I have to post twitter feeds of various protesters, like Jamell Spann, claiming that they want to die and take officers with them? I guarantee that if one of them goes and kills an officer tomorrow, their involvement would be minimized and the victim officer blamed for being a part of some nebulous evil blue conspiracy just by virtue of their job title. It’s really easy to throw your hands up and claim that you’re non-violent while bringing in people who are on the edge, talking to them about how evil the police are and how it would be great if SOMEONE did SOMETHING to hurt them like they hurt the community.  Speaking of which:

josh95By now, I’m sure most of my readers have heard that Joshua Williams, AKA Josh95, was arrested for dousing part of the QT in Berkeley with lighter fluid and trying to burn it down. For the record, a number of prominent protesters, like Shaun King, claim that the fires set at the gas station were put out by other protesters which is just utter nonsense.

Shaun king Now look at the response from other peaceful protesters in reference to Joshua’s arrest: handsupunited netaa cornelfresh search4swag FYI, this is why the Ferguson Protester movement is responsible for the extremists. Stuff like that and like this:

http://thenewinquiry.com/essays/in-defense-of-looting/

Furthermore, the latest unrest in Berkeley has also been a reminder that at the end of the day, the facts don’t actually matter. All that matters is the home team. The rush to judgment in the Mike Brown case demonstrated this. The absolute denial about the events leading up to the deaths of Vonderitt Myers and now Antonio Martin solidify the concept. I feel that what I’m about to say is so insultingly obvious that it goes without saying but here I go anyway:

The mere fact that a black person is shot by a police officer is not evidence of officer guilt or misconduct.

In fact, assuming that an officer killed a black person without justification simply because the officer was white, is about as ironically textbook racist as you can get. Saying that anyone is a certain way because of the color of their skin is racist. On a related note, there are some who have attempted to co-op the word “racism” by arguing that the definition of racism requires a position of power. Fittingly, this tends to absolve the speaker from being accused of racism for whatever supremely racist statement is about to come out of their mouths. It’s essentially a higher brow version of the prefix phrase, “I’m not racist, but…”

However, any objective definition of racism makes no reference to a position of power, but to a feeling of racial supremacy, typically tied to one’s own race, which allows for the degradation of another racial group. In other words, an individual believes that another group is a certain way, typically negative, as differentiated from the way they perceive their own group is characterized. Hatred and racism are tied so closely together because racist opinions are more often than not used as justification for preconceived hatred.

Furthermore, one of the most racist organizations in the entire United States, the KKK, has almost no actual power over the government (which isn’t by any means to discount their many atrocities). Taking this a step further, if the KKK has no governing power and if we follow the “power” definition, they’re not actually racist under that reasoning. The notion of which is mind-numbingly stupid.

The bottom line is that people don’t like hating other people without a reason. This extends far beyond race to political party, or religion, or sexual orientation, or that co-worker who just rubs you the wrong way. It’s just not polite to hate them simply because they’re breathing. It’s a lot easier to rationalize hatred if you consider them a bad person or subhuman. This is the role of racism in justifying hatred. Consequently, this is also the role in certain people hating white people or white policemen and trying to justify their murder (New York) or their attempted murder (Berkeley).


Some other items to address:

1.) The explosion in the gas station parking lot from Berkeley featured in the image from my second to last entry was in fact an improvised explosive of some kind and not an officer less lethal weapon as I initially suspected.

2.) I heard Bassem Masri called, “Blossom Masri” the other day in a nickname I can’t take credit for but will start using exclusively on this blog.

3.) The crime rate for the City of St. Louis and the near 160 murders this year does not tell the entire story of crime in the region. For one, if discussing violent crime or even gun crime, the murder rate does not account for those injured who did not die, or those shot at and not injured. Furthermore, the St. Louis County Crime statistics also only apparently account for unincorporated regions and any municipalities in those areas of the county assume the stats for those areas, making the county stats look better. According to the UCR’s Jennings alone had 7 murders or non-negligent homicides in 2013.  This rate is going to be drastically worse for 2014.

Along these same lines, the discussion of on-duty dangers that officers face only ever covers officers killed. No one ever discusses the tens of thousands injured or those who are the victims of attempts to kill or injure. The stats of assaults on officers for 2014, particularly in reference to Ferguson will be vastly under-reported in this regard. The reports of shots fired and bottles/molotovs being thrown have been so numerous overall that there’s just no way to accurately keep track of all of them, particularly in the moment, at the time while everything was on-going.  Each incident represents a crime stat in and of itself.  We don’t get a #justice hash-tag, nor do the other victims of violent crime in St. Louis who far outnumber those shot by police, let alone unjustly shot by police.

WS

Advertisements

11 thoughts on “Grand Vision

  1. Thank you for sharing your very reasoned and cohesive thoughts. I am in complete agreement with you, and have thought the very same thing in regards to white officers being the true victims of racism when they are forced to shoot a black criminal. Thank you for being a voice of sanity in an unbelievably insane situation.

    Like

  2. From the “new inquiry article: ” The dominant media is itself a tool of white supremacy: it repeats what the police deliver nearly verbatim and uncritically, even when the police story changes upwards of nine times, as it has thus far in the Brown killing. ” That’s patently false. The “unarmed teenager killed by white policeman” was what was trumpeted forever by the media, even after the assault on Darren Wilson was made public. The media never added “…after teenager assaulted policeman and refused to surrender when ordered to”. Of course, that’s not much a a sound bite headline, which is what the media lives and dies by.

    Like

  3. From this post: “The mere fact that a black person is shot by a police officer is not evidence of officer guilt or misconduct.” And to be sure, police officers don’t walk around with their guns drawn all day long! When I was in the airport in Rome Italy a few years ago, it was quite a different matter. On the terminal floor there was a policeman with a small sub machine gun held on his shoulder by a strap in such a way that he could fire it quickly if he had to–the barrel was parallel to the floor! On a nearby balcony, there was another policeman with what looked like an AK-47, also held on his shoulder by a strap in such a way that he could fire it quickly if he had to.

    Like

    • My sister was in a European airport several years ago when a small duffel was left unattended. The police just cleared that area and exploded it then and there, and reopened the area to passengers. Almost like it was a regular occurence. There were gendarmes also walking around with military weapons. I guess they do things a little differently over there!

      Like

  4. I have to way I appreciate all the time you took, Winston Smith, to write what you did. I learned a lot things I didn’t know, not only about what happened, but about police training, legalities, and procedure. I had forgotten the name of the character in 1984 until you mentioned it, but I do remember that book as bizarre when I read it (I was in high school). Years later, as our government did various forms of “new speak”, “double think”, and perhaps even “double speak”, it became obvious that Orwell was on to something (interestingly, “Orwell” was also a pseudonym or pen name!)–some of the “big lies” told by our government were so glaring that it was shocking, and yes, the media repeated them. Now there are protestors who have also perfected the art of lies and propaganda, rationalizing all kinds of bad behavior. The knee jerk response of the media because it has to deliver the news “first” exacerbates this problem, since fact checking relative to real time reporting, or any kind of reporting, is pretty much non-existent. To its credit, some of the local media outlets did turn a spot light the plight of some of the small (and sometimes minority) businesses in Ferguson which were destroyed by looting and arson. It was clear to me that what the protestors would like to have done was attack the Ferguson police station and the St. Louis County Government Center, but they didn’t have either the courage or the fire power to do that, so they instead took their rage out on innocent business owners, who have nothing to do with their “problems” nor can they help fix the “problems”. Such people are bullies and cowards all at the same time.

    On the bright side (that’s cynical, I know), I saw that a man who took gun shots at the police helicopter was arrested and charged for that and also for intimidating a witness, who, it appears, turned him in.

    Like

    • The “news” is pretty much just infotainment in the US. I always check other, foreign, sources to verify what is being reported. Even those sources are being corrupted by conglomerates.

      Like

  5. The news is scary lately. Hope you’re keeping safe out there.

    ” the discussion of on-duty dangers that officers face only ever covers officers killed.”

    Agreed. Those sorts of discussions also ignore the *type* of risk police offices face. Other jobs may be more dangerous in terms of lives lost, but police officers face the risk of dying due to deliberate malice, which brain studies currently indicate is a more stressful loss when it happens. For instance, someone losing their home to a deliberate fire bomb is more likely to be traumatized than someone losing their home to a tornado. Malice matters, malice wounds in more ways that the obvious, and the police face extraordinary levels of malice. It isn’t just danger that cops are dealing with.

    I do believe the local community has the responsibility to “hire, fire, and discipline” police officers — however, that does not justify the sort of kangaroo court the “Black People’s Grand Jury” looks to be. And while I, as a community member, have a responsibility to make sure the local cops are not running around harassing people or abusing their power, I also have a responsibility TO my local police. Police officers are employed by the community to do a very difficult job. The only other people I can think of who deal with anything like the abuse cops do are some people in the medical profession — and they deal with abusive people in a much more controlled situation, with orderlies as an added layer of protection.

    If my local leaders were insisting my local cops put up with some of the stuff the cops in Ferguson had to, I’d be marching in the streets myself. And for sure I’d be voting the politicians out ASAP. I won’t say communities get the cops they deserve, because frankly a lot of communities get better cops than they deserve. But I will say the obligations go in both directions, and if a community sees the local police force as simply something to be exploited, and believes that police officers have an obligation to suffer whatever abuse “peaceful protesters” hand out, with few opportunities of self-defense and no possibility of arrest, then a rational person is going to expect negative changes within that police force.

    Good cops believe in and respect the law. If the local leaders spit on the law enough times, if they keep cops from doing their jobs long enough, then they’re going to lose good cops. I suspect they already have.

    Like

  6. Have fun with that!!! You can’t make any of the witnesses come and talk to you, Sorry none of you can accept the truth when it so clear. God Bless our Law Enforcement, there is no reason their jobs should be made hard because people just can’t see past their noses. My opinion, you don’t like it, too bad so sad.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s